Dear Rolling Stone,
Your managing editor, Will Dana, gave reason to having the Jonas Brothers on the cover again. Buddy Holly, The Beatles, Sam Cooke and Stevie Wonder were actually talented "teen idols," whereas the Jonas Brothers are not. In fact, the brunt of artists featured on the cover (when you're not listing the top 100 issues of Rolling Stone's Top 100 issues of Rolling Stone) in the past few years haven't been anyone worth remembering. I regret having a subscription to your magazine as it's become a vapid parody of itself and is about as interesting as MTV (Random Notes seems to follow the same format as Us Weekly's Stars Are Just Like Us column). Issue 1082/1083 just so happened to be the last one of my subscription. Enjoy blowing the Jonas Brothers (when you're not blowing yourselves).
~Jeff Ortiz
Your managing editor, Will Dana, gave reason to having the Jonas Brothers on the cover again. Buddy Holly, The Beatles, Sam Cooke and Stevie Wonder were actually talented "teen idols," whereas the Jonas Brothers are not. In fact, the brunt of artists featured on the cover (when you're not listing the top 100 issues of Rolling Stone's Top 100 issues of Rolling Stone) in the past few years haven't been anyone worth remembering. I regret having a subscription to your magazine as it's become a vapid parody of itself and is about as interesting as MTV (Random Notes seems to follow the same format as Us Weekly's Stars Are Just Like Us column). Issue 1082/1083 just so happened to be the last one of my subscription. Enjoy blowing the Jonas Brothers (when you're not blowing yourselves).
~Jeff Ortiz
0 remarks:
Post a Comment